Lars requested the paralleled triode curves. Here they are:
And the SPICE model which is more accurate than my previous version:
* Created on Sat Jan 19 15:50:19 GMT 2013 using tube.model.finder.PaintKIT
* model URL: http://www.bartola.co.uk/valves/
* Created by Ale Moglia 2013 [email protected]
*————————————————–
.SUBCKT TRIODE_3A5-2 SMALL 1 2 3 ; P G K ;
+ PARAMS: CCG=.9P CGP=3.2P CCP=1.0P RGI=2000
+ MU=12.46 EX=1.3857 KG1=1965.0 KP=132.0 KVB=1.875 VCT=-1.6 ; Vp_MAX=200.0 Ip_MAX=0.032 Vg_step=2.0
*————————————————–
E1 7 0 VALUE={V(1,3)/KP*LOG(1+EXP(KP*(1/MU+(VCT+V(2,3))/SQRT(KVB+V(1,3)*V(1,3)))))}
RE1 7 0 1G
G1 1 3 VALUE={(PWR(V(7),EX)+PWRS(V(7),EX))/KG1}
RCP 1 3 1G ; TO AVOID FLOATING NODES
C1 2 3 {CCG} ; CATHODE-GRID
C2 2 1 {CGP} ; GRID=PLATE
C3 1 3 {CCP} ; CATHODE-PLATE
D3 5 3 DX ; FOR GRID CURRENT
R1 2 5 {RGI} ; FOR GRID CURRENT
.MODEL DX D(IS=1N RS=1 CJO=10PF TT=1N)
.ENDS
*$
Looking at distortion, as expected the pair of paralleled triodes performs better than a single triode: