Last week I did some preliminar tests with the LL2746 in 1:2 step-up mode. Despite having measured good results with it, it will be a challenge to drive grid current given that the output impedance of the 4P1L will be multiplied by 4 so about 5KΩ.
Before looking at the LL1671/20mA which is suitable for multiple driver valves, let’s see how the LL2746 driver performs with the addition of the input step-up microphone transformer LL7903. I’m currently using the LL7903 in my 814 SE A2 amplifier and sounds really nice. The LL7903 was wired up in 1:4 setup so gain can get about 63:
After a recent discussion in the DYI Audio forum about the 4P1L drivers, I decided to do some quick tests on an idea I had around to use a step up transformer (1:4) – 4P1L and step up interstage transformer (1:2) to drive a 300B or similar using the 4P1L in filament bias.
First suspicion is on whether the 4P1L has the grunt to drive a capacitive load which would be a real challenge in a 1:2 step up as load capacitance is multiplied by 4 when impedance is reduced by a factor of N^2=4.
I built a test rig with the 4P1L in filament bias using a 15Ω wire-wound filament resistor and connected the filaments in parallel to obtain easily a nice bias voltage with 650mA of filament current. Also lower Rf will improve the low frequency response as helps keeping low the output impedance:
The valve was biased at Ia=30mA / Va=160V and grid bias is about -10.2V. A 10KΩ resistor was added as a primary Zobel as per recommendation of the datasheet. Then it was replaced by a 25kΩ potentiometer (P1) and the right value was found by looking at the frequency response.
Initial tests showed a very good response at 1kHz with only 0.24% THD @200Vpp output. The gain is approximately 16. The mu of the 4P1L with paralleled filaments is around 8 and lower than when used in series which is approximately 9-10. Albeit the results were promising initially, the real test of this stage is by looking at high frequency response where the capacitance will makes it real pain.
After playing for some time with the uTracer, I found that the tracer wasn’t measuring accurately A2 curves. Ronald clearly advised me (as explained on his site) that uTracer wasn’t designed for this purpose although there was a great trick to use the screen driver to generate the A2 curves and also measure grid current. Measuring grid current is key in A2 mode so a better grid current model can be derived to better simulate the non-linear and low impedance behavior of the grid in positive bias.
My incarnation of the uTracer is not neat. I’m using my existing analogue curve tracer. As shown in the pictures below, my current tracer have a plethora of sockets and just adding right jumper cables for anode, cathode, screen and grid connectors will still give me the flexibility I had with my analogue tracer
Additional 3,300uF capacitor across C13 to help A2 traces
My version of the uTracer
uTracer using my analogue tracer sockets 🙂
The process of generating the A2 curves (and SPICE model) starts by plotting the normal curves. The uTracer is great for this. Then you have to overlay the A2 curves in Excel (or whatever tool you prefer) to combine both set of curves.
This is a fantastic 4P1L push pull incarnation done by Radu. I hope you enjoy reading this post as much as I did. Cheers, Ale
Introduction
“Shiny Eyes” Push-Pull tube amplifier is the result of 6 months of research, experimentation and lots of music listening. It started in the summer of 2012 when life opportunity re-opened the door of an old passion: electron tubes. However, this time my goals were directed towards audio. I understood from the beginning that after 30 years of interruption I have to dedicate a great amount of time and energy to catch up with technology and ideas. I want to thank my wife Paula for her emotional support and understanding. I am also grateful to the fanatics from the DIYaudio community for their contribution to the world of tube audio experimentation. Personal thanks to Kevin Carter of K&K Audio for his advises and help, to Ale Moglia of Bartola Valves for his inspiring work and to Rod Coleman for his excellent filament regulators.
Initial tests
Here are few images taken during design, experimentation and final building: Early stages…
We’re constantly obsessed to get the most out of our lives. Not a product of the capitalist world we live in, but a fact of our human nature. Its evolution.
When it comes to sonic power, unfortunately we are not too distance from this thought. We want more Watts. Yes, pure power. My generation back in the 80s got misled by the audio product marketing and their unrealistic metrics (e.g. PMPO) to fudge the real power of a solid state amplifier.
Continuing with this series of blog posts around the 6C4C push-pull design. As suggested my 45 in my previous blog entry, here is the 4P1L-4P1L version:
The first 4P1L driver stage remains unchanged, as does the output stage. The addition of the 4P1L differential pair with CCS tail and LL1660/pp IT is the main change of this design. The LL1660 is configured in ALT M or 2.25+2.25:2+2. I guess that a different IT could be used instead to get a lower output impedance on the diff pair and improve the performance in A2. The amp has more gain that I need in this configuration as it delivers its maximum power (circa 8W) when input is 1.2V peak.
So how does it performs?
Very low distortion indeed. About 0.06% up to 8W. Mainly odd harmonics dominating the sound of this amp.
I love the sweetness of my 45 SE amplifier, but you know what? A great push-pull (PP) amp has a fantastic presence, bass and dynamic response. Whenever I listen to a good PP amp, I get to the conclusion that I need to have different amps ready to be played depending to the music I want to listen to! My last two years have been devoted to what Morgan Jones calls in his book “single-ended madness”. And yes, my 4-65a SE in class A2 is slowly coming to life and when ready so then I will be properly mad.
6C4C amps I listened so far made a great impression both in SE and in PP. Owning all components required, I embarked on refining a full DHT push-pull design and again, cap-less (excluding the power supplies of course).