D3a driver w/ Rev08 board

A friend from Canada ordered a pair of boards and I used the opportunity to test the newly arrived hybrid mu-follower (aka as gyrator) Rev08 PCBs.  He will be using these boards in the 300B design posted here.

Continue reading “D3a driver w/ Rev08 board”

Hybrid Mu-follower (aka Gyrator) Rev08 PCB Update

It’s been far too long since I last posted on this blog. With the limited spare time I’ve got these days, I concentrated in setting up the new workshop and system since we moved back to our place. I’m nearly there, so now it’s time to get back to work

I made some updates to the “gyrator” PCB. I’ll stop referencing it gyrator from now on, since the name is misleading. However, it got popular that way. Nevertheless, it’s a hybrid mu-follower circuit but if only if you take the output from the anode, it behaves like a “gyrator” from a frequency response perspective. If you’re interested in this circuit in more detail, please read the lecture I gave last year at ETF.18. You can download it from here.

Back to the board, here are the few changes made:

  1. Moved the trimpot P1 for easier fixing of the board with the M3 standoffs.
  2. Added a gate stopper resistor (R9) to avoid oscillation at low anode current (<10mA) when using high-gm MOSFETs in the lower position J4. This was evident with devices like BSH111BNK
  3. Added an LED (D4) indicator and a series resistor (R8) at the drain of M3. This enables indication of:
    1. Normal operation subject to  value of R8
    2. Source current into load (e.g. like in A2 operation) subject to value of R8.
    3. Short output to ground. Depending on duration and current limitation of power supply, this may prevent damaging M3 MOSFET. Not guaranteed, but in some scenarios will work.

Continue reading “Hybrid Mu-follower (aka Gyrator) Rev08 PCB Update”

300B Amps: an early breadboard

Browsing my schematic archive I found this early implementation from some years ago on the 300B:

The amp design is straight forward. Let’s start from the output stage. The 300B is run hot at 33W (376V/90mA) with a fixed bias of about -78V. I used a pair of LL1623/90mA OPTs which I had wired on 3K:8 mode.

Continue reading “300B Amps: an early breadboard”

01a with filament SiC bias

I tried the below configuration and the results are very promising.  Sound is as good as previously implemented SiC cathode bias.

Now looking at the TH and frequency response:

The stage performs as expected. I built some prototype PCB for the SiC filament bias. One board per channel. If there is any interest, I will run a bigger batch

 

Sounds great, as always.

Cheers

Ale

 

Ba DHT Preamp Build

Just in the last days before the arrival of our second child, I had a spot of luck and managed to get some free time to work on my DHT preamp experiments. 

A pair of NOS Siemens “Ba” valves under initial testing 

Originally I was put off by the hum pickup susceptibility of the Ba German DHT. However, I decided it was time to listen to the design I worked and experimented in my workshop time ago. I remember listening to this valve and was very pleased with its sound. 

Continue reading “Ba DHT Preamp Build”

6Э6П-ДР (6e6p-dr) preamp / driver

With a quick mod on one of my active preamps, I managed to implement very quickly the 6Э6П-ДР (6e6p-dr) driver in my system. Here is how the circuit looks like:

6Э6П-ДР (6e6p-dr) preamp / driver

Continue reading “6Э6П-ДР (6e6p-dr) preamp / driver”

Driving hard (Part I)

Introduction

I’m a firm believer that if you don’t share, you don’t get back and learn. What the point of not sharing what you’ve learned? I asked myself the question again yesterday, just to push me a bit further. Joys of Easter break is that I have the time to sit down and write. At least for a little bit.

Here is the result of my quest of the years to find the best drivers for a SE amplifier. I’d been looking and experimenting with them in terms of best linearity at large volt swings (I mean large when I say 200Vpp), harmonic profile and most importantly the sound contribution.

Why should you bother? Well if you are in the DHT space (otherwise don’t bother reading further) and, unless you are building a 4P1L amplifier, the majority of the output valves require large volt swing. You also need good headroom. Therefore if the driver is clumsy, it will ruin your expensive project. Again, one of the reasons why people claim that their 300B sound bad. Achieving a driver which can perform 200Vpp effectively with minimal distortion and a decaying harmonic content isn’t a simple task.

In one of my recent post, I blogged an example of the GM70 amplifier. Look at the curves below and the demand to get all of the juice:

Yes, you can load it with a steeper load and use a 6KΩ instead of 10KΩ to get more power, but you still need the same volts to get the full swing.

The Driver Topology

I tried it (mostly) all over the years. Transformer coupled, choke loaded, resistor loaded. However, in my experience the best is the gyrator load. You may have a different view,  and so you may: well, it’s a free world and I’m not expecting you to agree with me. If you are prepared to accept my point for view, then you can continue reading this post 🙂

The hybrid mu-follower (aka gyrator load) is a very effective topology for a driver. You need sufficient volts at the supply, but that’s not generally a problem. You will need at least 25-50V more than the largest voltage swing. Most of the valves I will review below have a good compromise operating point at about 200V. For a 200Vpp or 250Vpp headroom, this means you need 200V+250V/2+50V = 375V. MOSFETs can work at this level and providing you put them the right heatsink size we’re on business!

Initially some years ago I explored the use of LEDs, diodes and particularly SiC diodes to bias the valves. However, I found later that a bit of cathode degeneration by placing and (unbypassed) resistor was a good choice. This linearise the valve a bit and won’t impact the output impedance of the driver. However, if the resistor is within a reasonable value (smaller than 300R I found in practice), the impact on the Frequency Response (FR) is manageable and also the reduction in gain of the stage.

I will present in this post my favourite contenders for the best drivers. These are:

  1. 6e6p-dr: the brother of the famous 6e5p, but a real performer on his own
  2. 6z49p-dr: an amazing pentode.
  3. 6z52p: high-gm and mu pentode. A replacement for the E810F or D3a for some. This is a pentode that works brilliantly on all fronts. Even at low voltages (thanks JC Labs)
  4. 6C45p: this little triode monkey oscillates widely, but can be tamed and works well, so don’t be afraid.
  5. 6e5p:  this famous Russian beauty doesn’t need introduction
  6. 12HL7: the sleeper and best discovery last year.

In all cases I found the sweet spot with fixed bias which allows me to dial-in the right operating point in conjunction with the gyrator setting point. Once the best performance was measured (and listened) it was replaced with an equivalent resistor and re-tested. A tedious job, but worth the efforts.

A note on oscillation

These valves have mostly high gm and gain. You’ve been warned. Don’t even attempt to build with them without special attention on the building aspects. It will oscillate, believe me. You should add grid, anode and screen stoppers. I prefer nice ferrite beads added straight to the socket pins. Continue reading “Driving hard (Part I)”

Another DHT Preamp

Another DHT Preamp on the way with Rod Coleman regs. I will do a A-B comparison with some Tentlabs modules, it’s an interesting experiment to undertake. The preamp has the classic gyrator Rev07 and Source Follower boards…

300B Un-bypassed Rk Bias Line Stage

Many times I get emails from DIY Audio builders who embark on building a DHT preamp when they don’t need gain, but instead what they need is a simple line stage to drive their amplifiers and interconnect cables effectively. Then they come back asking: “can I reduce the gain of the 01a or 4P1L preamps?”

For those who don’t need the gain, here is an interesting idea which brings together several design decisions which makes the DHT sound to its best. The challenge with many of the best sounding DHTs of low-mu is that is very hard to implement with filament bias. I’ve done a driver with a 46 in filament bias which was a crazy idea. I could turn of the heating with the amp running! It was a nice experiment though. With exception of the 71a and some other few DHTs, if you’re looking for good anode current and low ra, you’re in trouble. The 300B, 45/46, 50 and some other variations can’t be used in filament bias.

Subject to your religious beliefs in audio, you may not want to add a capacitor in the cathode, like me. I won’t dive into this discussion which is pointless as is a personal decision. If you continue reading this is simply because you value the sound difference in the DHT without a capacitor bypass in the cathode. Keep reading then…

Continue reading “300B Un-bypassed Rk Bias Line Stage”