In the quest of refining the 6C4C push-pull design I started not long ago, it was suggested by 45 to try a different driver. The famous E180F russian equivalent with gold grid: 6J9P-E. So I went back at my design and replaced the 4P1L driver with the 6J9P-E. Instead of filament bias, the bias was provided by a pair of red LEDs. The low dynamic impedance of these avoid the use of a bypass capacitor. Setting the operating point with the existing supply is a bit tricky but I found that Va=210V / Ia=14mA provides good swing and minimum distortion. Biasing the valve at around -3.7V keeps the valve away from grid current which will increase the distortion unnecessarily. So here is the circuit:
Tag: LL1684/PP
Push-Pull fascination (Part 2)
Thanks to the great feedback from 45, we found out that I made a mistake in modelling the LL1682 OT in my previous post. In a nutshell, I was getting half of the power, doh!
I should have started from scratch, looking at the push-pull curves and estimating at least the A1 power from a pair of 6C4C in push-pull. So following the B.J. Thomson method plotted the curves in push-pull:
Push-Pull fascination
I love the sweetness of my 45 SE amplifier, but you know what? A great push-pull (PP) amp has a fantastic presence, bass and dynamic response. Whenever I listen to a good PP amp, I get to the conclusion that I need to have different amps ready to be played depending to the music I want to listen to! My last two years have been devoted to what Morgan Jones calls in his book “single-ended madness”. And yes, my 4-65a SE in class A2 is slowly coming to life and when ready so then I will be properly mad.
6C4C amps I listened so far made a great impression both in SE and in PP. Owning all components required, I embarked on refining a full DHT push-pull design and again, cap-less (excluding the power supplies of course).